Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad, MP Kuala Selangor.
As if the rots that have plagued the judiciary weren’t enough to erode the confidence of the people towards this critical institution, the de facto Law Minister, DS Nazri Aziz, on Monday, stunned the House when he said that there’s no law to criminalize brokering for judicial appointment. Despite all the hue and cry, VK Lingam is after all going to be scot-free as no crimes were established.
This has surely brought utter disrepute to the already tainted judiciary, now badly in need of a ‘total overhaul’ of its image and integrity. While the claim of an absence of a legislation or an act to ‘illegalise’ and ‘criminalise’ may be unfortunately true, his suggestion that ‘Lingham might have just acted to fix the appointment of judges to impress’ was really a very bad joke. I almost wanted to say that he has turned himself into a clown. But I would reserve it for another day.
But this decision has made a huge mockery of the Royal Commission of Inquiry on VK Lingam’s fiasco. I stood in that august house on that day, to make the minister to commit saying that ‘what may be morally wrong could be legally or politically right’ in this country of ours.
He answered in the affirmative without hesitation. He wanted to lecture us on that. He chose to be oblivious of the saying of Abraham Lincoln and many a great mind on the subject of “Philosophy of Law”, “Moral Foundation of Law” and “Theory of Law” 101.
Admittedly also, the acrimonious debate is a long standing one, from time immemorial. Notwithstanding, the case of Lingam is surely so obviously ‘wrong’ as much as it is ‘immoral’. When an action could not, but be interpreted, as brokering or lobbying for an appointment of the highest position of the office of the judiciary, it indeed is an open assault on the integrity of the judiciary.
And that is almost subversion and ‘treason’ to the state. The entire act of those involved in the Lingam’s case is despicable as it inevitably brings one to the next logical conclusion. If judges’ appointment could be fixed than logically verdicts/judgments of judges could as well be similarly fixed, at a ‘certain price’ of course.
Most atrocious in the Lingam’s case is the fact that, while the ‘brokering’ may be immoral but legal, the latter ie writing judgment, while both immoral and illegal, also escaped the long arm of the law. The nation must not take all these assaults lying down. This will be elaborated later.
Nazri had in fact earlier said that further investigations into the Lingam’s case cannot be undertaken by the MACC as the key witness could not be located. The MACC had subsequently classified the case as ‘no further action’ (NFA).
In an effort to counter the various indiscriminate claims of the law minister, the Opposition MPs have brought a key witness sought by the Malaysian Ant-Corruption Commission (MACC) to Parliament yesterday (Tuesday 10). Jayanthi L.G Naidu was Lingam’s former secretary at the time of the royal commission’s probe into Lingam’s alleged involvement in brokering the appointment of judges.
Reading from her written statement, Jayanthi explained that she has been available to assist MACC in their investigations at all times and was very willing to cooperate with the ant-graft body. She was also called in as a witness by the commission to testify about Lingam’s holiday with the former Chief Justice Eusoff Chin to New Zealand.
She had given a full statement in 1998 regarding the trip to the former Anti-Corruption Agency (now MACC). She repeated this at the royal commission’s proceedings. She had told the ACA and the royal commission that Lingam and Chin’s family holiday trip to New Zealand in 1994 was arranged and paid for by Lingam. She stands her ground to date. Kudos Jayanthi! Her safety is now the responsibility of the nation.
However, the commission found that no crime has been committed as both parties had paid for their own respective holidays and that further investigations cannot be undertaken as a key witness could not be located. The rakyat now wishes to know who the person is, as only he or she is capable of putting the case to rest for ever.
But most appalling, the MACC and Nazri had both refused to name the witness that could not be located. If it’s not Jayanthi, they must now name the person as it is critical to safeguard the integrity of the judiciary. Their actions are indeed at best irresponsible and at worst amounting to ‘subverting’ the judiciary. Is that both moral and legal?
Inter alia, Jayanthi also divulged information pertaining judgment delivered by Judge Mokhtar Sidin in the Vincent Tan vs MGG Pillai ’s libel case that was written in the office of Lingam. Besides, on various occasions, she confessed having withdrawn large sums of cash between RM100,000 and RM300,000 under Lingam’s instructions which then were wrapped in gift boxes with the understanding that they were to be hand-delivered by others to individual judges.
“On one occasion I saw one of these money boxes being placed with a box containing a cake to be delivered to a judge,” she testified.
Despite the commission’s recommendation to conduct fresh investigations into the Lingam’s case, authorities decided to close two of the investigation documents and another was marked as ‘no further action’.
The Pakatan MPs and the rakyat the nation over, now unequivocally demand that the MACC and the relevant authorities would re-think their position.. The buck must stop at the premier. Pak lah, as a reminder to all and particularly to Najib, has now left a ‘legacy of lost opportunity’.
Najib had equally pronounced high-sounding rhetoric, ever since he took over the premiership in the same tradition of his predecessors. But slogans without substance undermine trust.
This is an opportune time to placate grouses against himself and vindicate his claims of People’s First. If he insists of doing it wrongly again, let him be reprimanded that, (quoting Voltaire), ”It’s dangerous to be right, when the government is wrong”!.
He shall be duly punished come next 13th GE!
Filed under: Artikel







scary Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad, Malaysian should all act what the Indons did lately……
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia-pacific/2009/11/20091111133250544572.html
YB Dr. Dzul. This article is great and it only goes on to show that the BN Government has no resolve whatsoever to to root out corruption. To say that Lingam is morally wrong and has not broken the law certainly insults the intelligence of the citizens. Writing a judgement for Mokhtar Sidin is not unlawful? Nazri has been insulting his own intelligence by talking cocamamie in Parliament and in the public and insulting the office of de facto law Minister.
Please keep up the goodwork YB and do all that is possible to throw the BN Government out of office in GE13.
I believe that there are always good judges in our country, they may be few but their actions and words always give hope to the rakyat that there is justice in malaysia. BUT most unfortunately, I am sad to say they are no PAU CHENG among them. WHY???? Is it because they fear for their rice bowl and all the potential lost benefits that their family could enjoyed. It is time the rightous seek to undo the dark forces that is destroying our judiciary. RISE UP NOW the rakyat demands of you…. Resign en mass to show that the judiciary is rotten to the core… seek your place in history to restore the rightous virtues
YB,
I had been the sole contributing editor of the Annotated Anti-Corruption Act 1997 for Malayan Law Journal and have now been commissioned to annotate the MACC Act 2009, scheduled for completion by February 2010.
The act of “brokering” the appointment of any person to a public or private body is caught by the all-encompassing definition of “gratification” in both the ACA and MACC Acts. This is particularly more serious, when the appointment of Judges and Chief Justice is concerned, apart from perverting the course of justice, treason et al.
As usual, the former lawyer and de facto law minister, does not know the law, when he said what he was reported to have said. Remember when he qouted the Witness Protection Act, when it did not even exist! He even equated remand proceedings under section 117 of the Penal Code (when investigations cannot be completed within 24 hours) with the ISA, to justify detention without trial! Need we to say more!
I would urge all Malaysians to purge our beloved country of the scoundrels, scalliwags, scumbags and rogues, who have been mis-ruling and abusing their powers for 52 years. State governments under PR have been office for less than 2 years. It is both unfair and unrealistic to expect such state governments to unravel and right the wrongs of their predecessors, which had been pillaging and pillorying their respective states for 52 years.
I am not saying that PR is faultless, as it is after all a political coalition with its own political agenda(s). If PR goes the route of BN, then Malaysians can also vote PR out at the next general elections. However, please save us from the silly slogans and double-speak. As the Red Indians used to say, “White men speak with forked tongues” but our ministers speak with 1Tongue but multiple lies. They are only fooling themselves and those who want to be fooled, but not all Malaysians!
Malaysians are no longer that naive and their intelligence cannot be assailed by such inane nonsense from the so-called ministers and the Prime Minister. Malaysians are the employers of all ministers and employees in the public service, police and armed forces. It does not bode well for ministers and those of their ilk to keep insulting and haranguing Malaysiana with empty rhetoric. Is the de facto law minister and MACC looking for a non-existent witness, when the primary witness is ready and willing to come forward to give evidence? There is no property in any witness, whether he or she is offered by PR or Barisan Nasional MP’s.
As the inconvenient former judge, N H Chan, advised us on how to judge the Judges, we Malaysians shall pass judgment all our MP’s and Statement Assemblypersons (and frogs, if they dare stand) at the next general elections.
Cheng Poh Heng
As the saying goes*In the land of the blind,the one-eyed man is king*;similarly in Malaysia where the people are docile & amiable,the one party BN is *king*;pathetic & petrifying but its a fact of life;insyah Allah this situation can be rectified soonest possible,Alhamdulilah!
A fantastic writing. Taniah!
If even murder by VIPs can be covered up, what is the problem in covering up ‘judicial fixing’.
If this government is not defeated in the next GE, this country will be in real shit.
Dear Dr. Zul,
You have said what has to be said. I could feel that this piece has been written with a little frustration. I am frustrated too. We can only point out the wrongs loudly. Believe me no action would be taken and slowly but surely all would be forgotten. It is a game of “I scratch your back and you scratch mine”.
We have to be patient. Wait for the next election. In the mean time the opposition should clean up their acts and learn to administer.
God Bless Malaysia.
Dr , Good work , have patient, we will get rid of him in the next GE
Dear Dr Zul,
Malaysia should have more righteous pople like you. Keep up the good work.
God Bless You and Malaysia
This is so much of 1Malaysia Slogan where they claimed its People 1st. It depends who are the people . Not the Rakyat of course. PM your 1Malaysa is full of 1SHIT that is taking the people and country for a ride…a good ride. BN has to be kicked out by next GE.
This is so much of 1Malaysia Slogan where they claimed its People 1st. It depends who are the people . Not the Rakyat of course. PM your 1Malaysa is full of 1SHIT that is taking the people and country for a ride…a good ride. BN has to be kicked out in next GE.
Salam Dr Zul,
What do you expect from a law minister, whose son, together with his buddies, were accused of killing in public a certain “Derek” in hartamas many years ago at Don’t cafe.
Imagine fighting 5 against 1.
The foreign waiters in the eatery were quickly bundled and put under police custody and evicted out of the country.
The police, if I recall, did not take any action against the perpetrators.
There could be a settlement of some sort between Nazri and the mother of “derek”. But the fact is that the guys who were accused of committing the crime are still free.
The more I continue reading such “horror” stories committed by people we entrusted to run our country, the more I distrust them.
I wonder how much impact all these have at GE13 when most people are not aware or privvy to such news/information, especially those who are outside the reach of cyberspace, those who read/write no english, those who are contented with living their simple life.
PR’s efforts should focus on educating the greater population and ensure the people understand what is at stake – the integrity and wellbeing of our nation. But, do most people really care?
Dear YB Dr Dzul,
Have faith the Rakyat will know what needs to be done in the next GE. Good article.